Smart Company – Australia’s top web 2.0 entrepreneurs
Grant Young and I made Smart Companies list today of Australia’s top web 2.0 entrepreneurs. I’m chuffed to be there and Grant who started Saasu with me would probably agree that we look up to our peers mentioned in the article so it feels a bit weird being there.
Top Web 2.0 Teams would be the article I’d love to see. I wish they had mentioned Jusa who was instrumental in the last 5 years to get us to where we are today. He’s the young brains behind our now quite old company. He’s created the engineered application that Saasu has become. There is always more behind the success than the cliché entrepreneur. Our team who built Saasu which also included Kas, Pete, Emma, Dympna, Nik, John and Will all caused the success.
My Changing Search Behaviour
I’m finding that I am using Google less and less. Mostly now for specific search such as a device driver update. I know that writing lots of specific keywords will retrieve lots of specific results.
Targeted search – For knowledge and information I tend to hit Wikipedia, Google Blogsearch and Delicious
Consumer choice – I tend to go straight to go straight to Twitter for word of web backup and if it’s not something techy and thus not as talked about on Twitter I tend to go back to Google hoping to hit some forum comments on the product or service.
For finding services I’d go to aggregated services websites like ServiceSeeking
For benchmark prices I would always go to Ebay, Google Products, Amazon and others. These quite often lead me to specific e-commerce sites. i.e. it’s helping me do brand and price exploration and only sometimes the actual buy transaction. So search engines aren’t catching me at all when it comes to spending dollars. So if you sell stuff you need web stores!
Government Guarantee is Not a Low Deposit Rate Certainty For Banks
Ironically, now that Federal Reserves are busy guaranteeing bank deposits they have created a whole new set of problems in the competition for capital.
It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that banks should borrow money at the same rate the government does if it’s now the same risk. It’s not that simple. Fussy money (money sensitive enough to deposit rates that it gets moved) is leaving the banks who are reducing their deposit rates to find a new home paying a higher rate of return. That money sometimes just changes bank or asset class within a country but it can also change countries which opens up a whole bunch of foreign exchange activity. So banks need to pay a higher deposit rate than the Government does to attract investment, despite having a Government Guarantee.
If banks lower their deposit rates because they have a government guarantee they risk losing funding. At the same time the margin they make between lending and borrowing increases. This quandary of protecting liquidity versus improved margins is a whole new ‘how low can you go’ game in the banking sector for deposit rates.
We know in business that small increases in prices cause much larger increases in profit. The impact on your P&L is magnified due to the change in your margins (the difference between where you buy and sell your goods). The same magnifier applies to bank margins but also in a far more leveraged way because they usually have around $10 of assets for every $100 of loans and deposits. Even a small 0.10% change in deposit rates (cost of funds) has large implications for profit or lower mortgage rates (in lieu of profit).
Thus an ethical dilemma exists for banks to keep the margin or pass it on. Should banks be forced to pass on any gain from the government guarantee to their borrowers or are market forces best placed to do this?
Many uncertainty that surrounds how long with the guarantee will exist and how many deposits it covers manifests itself in higher deposit rates despite the guarantee.
Personally I’m against the government guarantee, why give banks more help than they need. Why risk seeing capital shift offshore looking for higher rates of return. Why not step in at the ninth hour and save the odd bank that looks like collapsing but only if all other avenues have been explored. This would be better than handing out free money to a sector who have made more than enough over the last 10 years to muscle them through a recession.
Money will always flow toward the best rate for a common risk and liquidity profile in markets. So a government guarantee does not imply you should only earn the same rate from a bank that the government would pay to borrow money. If anyone from a bank tells you otherwise then it’s misleading.
Developer Numbers vs Device Numbers – iPhone vs Android
I noticed a bunch of devices Google is supporting for Gmail on Android. Yet again this reminds me of the big difference between the two strategic models. It will be interesting to see how having lots of licensed developers working with a single device (Apple) compares to having a smaller but arguably less constrained community of developers (plus 1 very big one – Google) developing for multiple devices. Which model will win this war?
Screenshot from Google Mobile
James Burchfield the Human Beat-box
Watching my 5 year old sons face as he watched this video on TED.com was priceless.
The Blame Game – Hunting Financial Witches
Who’s at fault in the financial crisis? I hate witch hunts, they always seem to burn the wrong person in the end. However I must say that I can’t disagree with restricting payouts to people leaving sinking ships.
One party who needs to be held more accountable are the Federal Reserves. For at least a decade Federal Reserves have been finessing a stable inflation rate while allowing asset prices (many are not captured in inflation numbers) to dramatically outstrip wages. This makes the average person poorer in an affordability sense and sends them of to the predatory lenders to get some money to buy what they want – stuff to make them happy.
They have also allowed cheap money to build up in the economy by keeping unrealistically low interest rates for very long periods of time. When what they should have been doing is managing interest rates on a more realistic inflation measure that included assets prices.
The result of consumer-itis (the disease of getting lots of stuff in the hope of getting happiness) coupled with the capacity to buy it (lots of cheap money) has resulted in heavily indebted families with crappy home ownership affordability.
Here’s the rough maths.
When you earn 50k. All your money will go on rent, food and service. Probably 100%. You will probably fund excess using debt.
When you earn 500k. You will struggle to spend what you earn and it will in all likelihood end up in assets. Those assets generally get geared because you are told that is tax effective and gears up those returns. Rising prices (higher percentage of equity you own in the assets) lets you go and get more debt to buy more assets. The whole thing just fuels itself and creates a liquidity bubble. In the end you make stacks of money and end up with a huge gap between the low and high socioeconomic classes.
This crisis unwinds this. The reverse happens, asset prices plummet as assets need to be sold to pay of debt. Unfortunately everyone is rushing for the door at once because someone shouted fire. Those same people arrived at the party gradually. This is why prices go crazy when you see many people unwinding their geared assets all at once.
Some of you are thinking this is about risky investments. Well yes you’re right except that they don’t get created without a market and there has been a strong market of wealthy buyers for many years. The people whinging about those risky investments are the same ones slapping high fives at dinner parties when their geared risky investments paid them nice 25% p.a. returns.
As I saw in a Ted talk recently. It’s a little like blaming America for the war in Iraq. I might think it’s a mistake them being there but common sense tells us that had there been no 9/11 there would have been no war. “No 9/11, No War”. So the witch hunt should turn on itself if it is to be fair. The government is just as much to blame as the bankers who are just as much to blame as the debt binging consumers and return hungry superannuation investors.
Everyone has a choice to put their dollars in nearly risk free government bonds or low risk bank deposits. I think if you were that risk adverse and you lost your money you are quite justified in complaining. Everyone else needs to take it on the chin.
The witch hunt never seems to get it right because there isn’t such a thing as a right choice in the blame game.
Add-ons and Extensions Lockin
I’m really beginning to appreciate the lockin caused by browser plugins. It’s just simply easier to keep going back to my Firefox browser from Safari or Chrome to get some plugin love (time savings). Predominantly, this is a hassle-of-change lockin. Still it’s real.
I haven’t done much research on Safari plugins, I’m sure there are some good ones out there and I found a few here at Pimp My Safari. Chrome is fast and if it had the plugins Firefox had I might be tempted to set it to my default browser. My top 3 plugins are Firebug by Parakey Inc, MeasureIt by Kevin Freitas and SeoQuake by Aramis, Pelmen and Lelik.
